
This morning the half term break afforded me unexpected space in the diary. I used it to produce a paper which will be given to each member of my congregation this Sunday. It is intended as an educational tool to equip the faithful for prayer and reflection as we seek to discern God’s will. If you would like me to email you a printable copy simply send me a message on frtomlinson@yahoo.co.uk I have tried to be measured and fair but it is obviously reflective of my own thinking at this time:
What has the Pope done?
Pope Benedict has responded to cries for help from Catholic Anglicans feeling marginalised within a national church which is heading in an increasingly radical and progressive direction. He has done this by offering a unique chance to leave the Church of England and unite as a new body within the Roman Catholic church. This new body will be distinctly Anglican in history, identity and patrimony.
How will this new body be distinctly Anglican?
We do not yet have details of the Pope’s offer so little is known! However we do know that this new body will accept married priests in the present, encourage Anglican liturgy (such as the English Missal we use at S. Barnabas) and encourage whole congregations to move together.
Why has the Pope done this?
This move suggest the Pope believes the Church of England is no longer capable of supporting Catholic Christians. Anglo-Catholics have long feared that, in the face of secularism and political correctness, Anglicanism is abandoning the faith and watering down the Gospel. This move demonstrates that the Roman Catholic authorities agree. It spells an end to any hope of unity between Rome and Canterbury, leaving anyone professing to be Catholic (yet staying within the Anglican fold) on very shaky ground doctrinally.
What was making life so difficult for Anglican Catholics?
The decision to ordain women in 1992 dealt a massive blow to those believing holy orders are not ours to tamper with. Whilst we admire the desire for equality we do not believe we have authority to change church teaching at whim and without the backing of scripture. We oppose women priests, not because they are women (a sexist position) but because we are unconvinced that they are authentic priests (a theological position). Now the church has decided to make women bishops as well, meaning a question mark will hang over the heads of all, men and women, whom they ordain. Clearly sacramental unity within our own church will be shattered forever.
So is this all about women bishops?
Certainly not! Women priests, like the push for gay marriage, are mere symptoms of a deeper malaise. Anglican Catholics, along with Evangelicals, Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox Christians believe in a revealed faith. That Jesus really was born of Virgin and raised from the dead! Our calling is therefore one of obedience. We look to Jesus, the same yesterday, today and forever. The Pope is not offering space because we oppose women priests, he offers space because we affirm Catholic truth!
In contrast modern Anglicanism is growing theologically liberal and fuzzy. Many no longer believe that Jesus was unique, they suggest his teaching was limited by his culture, they claim that Christian tradition is not yet fully revealed. It follows that if God is still in the process of revealing, we can altar historic teaching when it feels appropriate. Anglicanism now comprises two irreconcilable beliefs.
Could we not just differ from within the same church?
The triumph of Anglicanism has always been to hold conflicting views in tension, allowing for diversity and choice. But this only worked when holy orders were not in doubt and when we could unite around an altar in unity. More recently the church has been fractured and unable to maintain this status quo. It has been increasingly obvious that, in seeking to be progressive, the Anglican Church has grown less tolerant, especially of those espousing an orthodox faith.
Are Catholic Anglicans disloyal then in welcoming this gesture?
Hardly. The Anglican church has had plenty of time to provide something similar and it is telling that the General Synod has repeatedly and stubbornly refused to do so. Anglo-Catholics have long campaigned for the creation of structural space so that when women become bishops, we are not forced to accept the innovation.
But those campaigning for women Bishops have resented this, stating that concession for Catholic Anglicans is an affront to social justice. And whilst we were begrudgingly given flying bishops in 1992, many now wish to remove this. Instead of being provided for, we have been pushed to the margins and treated with disdain. Fortunately the Pope’s offer of help exposes the wickedness of those who have accused us of bigotry, his affirmation demonstrating that it is we orthodox, not the progressives, who are wanted by Rome.
In July 2008 the lack of charity towards us worsened when the General Synod broke a promise made in 1992, that ‘those opposing the ordination of women would always be granted an honoured place within the Church’. Instead they passed a vote proclaiming that all opponents to this innovation were no longer faithful Anglicans! On that day every motion put forward by Catholics was defeated. It was a crushing day for the orthodox which left many in tears. It is a very sorry reflection on the Church of England that the Pope now offers, in love, what they have continually refused us in scorn.
So how will General Synod respond?
That is anyone’s guess! Following that synod in July a Revision Committee was charged with sorting the mess. ++ Rowan Williams lamented our treatment and there was a flicker of hope that provision might be found. Encouragingly the revision committee was headed by our own Archdeacon, Clive Mansell, whom we know to be fair.
A few weeks ago the revision committee reported back. The group have worked hard and should be praised. Their proposal, whilst falling short of what Catholics require, shows a definite increase in generosity. But we must remain cautious! The final decision will rest with General Synod and already the progressives have lambasted the generosity shown and avowed to defeat this report at the vote.
Might the Pope’s offer prompt Synod to think again?
Perhaps but do we really wish to be a part of a church that no longer loves us? And what would stop a Synod, that has already broken one promise, from doing so again? In a church where all is decided by vote there is little protection for those who stand firm! That said we must be open to every possibility as we seek to follow God’s will. It may be that a life exists for Catholics inside the Anglican fold but a lot of reassurance, love and penitence will need to be shown by those who have, thus far, shown little love at all.
As we weigh up the options we must further ask why any Catholic Anglican, who prays daily for reunion with Rome, would turn the Holy Father down? This is a hugely momentous occasion, affording the possibility to join a body who not only want us but proclaims the same faith. Not even the most optimistic optimist can state that Anglicanism can give us similar assurances!
But what of buildings, fabric and money?
Ultimately, if Anglican Catholics accept this offer (and no decision can possibly be made until the details are clear), the Anglican church can respond in one of two ways.
It could seek to work with the Vatican, helping congregations who sincerely believe God is calling them to create a new home. This would then allow women to become bishops much sooner!
Such response would lead to a sharing of resources. Buildings could be released where congregations were united or shared where divided. This seems the Christian way, especially as no Diocese can confidently claim to own a building built, maintained, resourced, cleaned and worshipped in by the local congregation?
The alternative is too terrible to comprehend. It would involve litigation, bitterness and in-fighting.. Nobody benefits but lawyers! Please God spare us from this!
So what happens now?
Undeniably we are at a turning point in history. Anglo-Catholicism will never be the same whatever path we choose! As we seek to discern God’s voice let us pray that love and not hatred might be exercised by those on both sides of this challenging theological divide.