
Yesterday the Archbishop of Canterbury was speaking in Rome and launched a most extra-ordinary address! I say extraordinary because the usually taciturn, gentle and measured Archbishop transformed into a strident, unapologetic and even cheeky orator! Why he even suggested Rome should adopt Anglican practice and start ordaining women! I did not know whether to be impressed, amused or outraged! As one clever spark commented elsewhere- this was akin to Gordon Brown lecturing the Chinese on sustaining a growing economy and upholding prudent economic practice!
For in depth analysis- pop over to the Sevenoaks blog and ponder Fr. Ivan’s words. As he has done such a fantastic job it is pointless my doing the same. Instead I offer three pithier thoughts that entered my own little head. Obviously this is personal reflection and I do not claim to understand the real motivation of the unfathomable Archbishop!
1) My first reflection is that, whilst this was addressed to a Roman Catholic audience, it was not meant for them. This smacked of a robust defence of Anglicanism intended to demonstrate, to watching media and a people back home, that Rowan is a force to be reckoned with. The impression given that his church is not the crumbling mess many are claiming but a wonderful communion worthy of emulation for its diversity and wisdom.
Now ++Rowan is well within his rights to do this and I commend him for it. I see here an attempt to get talks between two communions back on the track. If Rome has given up on Anglicanism as worthy of full communion, which it clearly has due to the ordination of women and practising homosexuals, Rowan must shift the goalposts. His plea is no longer for full communion, rendered impossible, but for a new focus on first and not second order issues. This becomes a plea not to totally give up on one another and I do hope that message is headed, as I am certain it will be. We Christians must be charitable with one another- an aspect often sadly lacking in these days of increasing uncertainty.
But what was intended as a noble defence of Anglicanism then descended into farce in my opinion. It lacked force, not because of the Archbishop’s integrity per se, but due to the lamentable reality of the situation at home. How can ++Rowan hold up Anglicanism as ‘model institution’ when it is so fractured at this time? Why would anyone ape it, as he encourages them to do, when it is unable to heal its wounds or gather around one altar? Thus the suggestion that Rome should adopt the ordination of women, sounded as ridiculous as it did delusional. If he really was speaking to Rome and expecting them to listen, then I suggest a visit to a psychiatrist is in order!
2) I would also highlight the point raised by Fr. Ivan. Why does the Archbishop commend use of separate structures as a menas of peace, when his own Synod and House of Bishops refuses precisely that option to Anglo-Catholics at home? If he has confidence in this, which shows wisdom, why has he not strongly defended our cause? ++Rowan cannot have it both ways! If he endorses the Revision Committee’s decision to offer us nothing, save a lousy code of practice, then he can hardly spout off about alternative provision elsewhere.
3) Finally I am amazed the Archbishop speaks so stridently in favour or women’s ordination, without aknowledging that the innovation is still meant to be in a period of reception and has inflicted such deep wounds in his own church. It would seem he is declaring the ‘process of reception’ over without waiting for the Universal Church to accept it also! Is this not huberis and a direct contradiction of his own advice?
And so we reach the thorny problem at the heart of this address. Rowan encourages Christians to grow together through obedience and love. Perfect…only he says this as unrepentant leader of a Church in blatant disregard for obedience to scripture, tradition and the mind of the Universal church. The hypocrisy is therefore breathtaking. Here is the Anglican leader, presiding over a church which sticks fingers up at critics and consecrates active gay divorcees and women, preaching to others about obedience.. so, as I said at the outset, cheeky! And hence my unease when I read it. It seems a little akin to Robert Mugabe preaching to the UN regarding a need to tacjle corruption!
As ever I cannot pin our Archbishop down. Is he a tortured Catholic doing everything in his power to turn an ailing church around? Or is he a very clever liberal who hides behind foggy words and an impressive intellect- deliberately playing for time as change is ushered forth. His unwillingness to tackle issues suggest this might be true. Either way I pray for him as he meets with Pope Benedict today. May they work for peace and seek a solution within Anglicanism that finds a sincere home for Anglo-Catholics which can clear the way for women bishops et al elsewhere!